The Trump phenomenon

Well it looks like the end for Trump, though that’s been said before. But I do think that on Inauguration Day it’ll be Joe Biden sworn in.

So I would like to address both those of you who support Trump and those of you who loathe him, because I think both of you are missing some things about the Trump Phenomenon.

The first thing to consider is the absurd improbability of his ascension.

A high-end real estate developer and reality TV show host who had never held elective office nor a military commission blew past 16 seemingly better-qualified candidates to win the Republican nomination, then defeated a candidate with time in the White House, time in the Senate, time in the State Department, an overwhelmingly favorable media, the endorsement of a popular sitting president, and a campaign chest somewhere around two to five times as large.

Immediately afterwards I published a video blog titled, “What the heck just happened?”

And that’s another interesting thing, nobody was interested in the question.

You’d think something so odd and unusual would raise questions. But the reaction on one side was jubilation. On the other side it was stark terror – and rage. And I understand both.

Jubilation because many thought correctly this meant the beginning of great change. And change is exhilarating.

And terror because many thought correctly this meant the beginning of great change. And change is terrifying.

Both are correct because change presents the opportunity for those whose situation appears static to seize the opportunities presented.

And for those who are reasonably content with their situation change is terrifying because it is most often for the worse.

Trump inspired rage in what we called the Establishment back when I was a young radical: legacy media, academia, the Washington establishment even or especially within his own party, and the intelligence community.

Trump’s ascension is the result of a genuine working class rebellion. Something his detractors miss when they note with scorn that his supporters have a far lower percentage of four-year degrees than his opponents – i.e. they work at blue collar jobs.

It certainly seems odd that working class people should rally around a billionaire who loves his babes and bling, but then consider how working class folks like to spend vacation time in Vegas or Graceland.

And the irony is how the left, allegedly friends of the working class, has totally missed the boat on this. Because the American working class is different from a lot of others around the world. They are better educated than at any time in history, and often more affluent than the college educated. And they are getting damned sick and tired of the slights and insults they get from their “betters.”

Democrats, I urge you to consider that Trump is the most anti-Establishment candidate since Jimmy Carter and far more effective at getting his agenda advanced. And I urge you not to be afraid of change. It could go horribly wrong but it could be our salvation as a country.

Conservatives, you might want to consider if the movement that coalesced around Trump has outgrown the need for a flamboyant leader. The changes he set in motion are not going away and it might be time for the movement to mature, lest it get stuck at the stage us old hippies used to call “freaking out the straights.”

Now might be the time for a steady, stable, unexciting organization man like for example Mike Pence. And you might ask yourself if Trump had that in mind from the beginning.

Posted in Culture, Op-eds, Politics | 4 Comments

Thanksgiving in a time of crisis

Thanksgiving is upon us again, this year in somewhat strained circumstances.

Some state governors have issued edicts defining exactly how many people you can have for dinner, and even what degrees relationship are permissible.

Reactions range from loud defiance to self-righteous scorn.

“You’ll get my turkey and dressing when you pry my cold dead hands off it!”

“If you don’t isolate and wear a mask you are murdering your neighbors!”

Doesn’t matter, they will be impossible to enforce. Some idiots may try and bust some overlarge gathering of people who will then become martyrs and dine out on the story of how they were persecuted for their beliefs for years afterwards.

I do not wish to appear impatient with my fellow-citizens. I know how many are facing financial ruin because of the lockdowns. But the fact is, we’re such homebodies we’ve hardly noticed.

I work from home and my daughter gets her school work dropped off twice a week and does it at home. We like each other’s company and we have a dog who’s ecstatic her family is home all the time.

I did have to attend a training conducted under social distancing rules with masks required, but only for a few days. It’s inconvenient, especially when it’s cold outside and you wear glasses. And
I did have to slip the mask down under my nose because I was experiencing headaches from rebreathing my own exhalations. But nothing like what people I know are experiencing.

So while I do not wish to dismiss anyone’s concerns, it might be helpful to remember that Thanksgiving was instituted in times of far greater troubles than we are experiencing.

The holiday is based on ancient harvest festivals, where people celebrated with joy and relief that they’d once again succeeded in producing enough surplus to live on until the next harvest.

The semi-legendary first Thanksgiving in the New World was celebrated at Plymouth colony in 1621 after half the colony had died over the winter.
The first national celebration was proclaimed by George Washington, that November 26, 1789, “as a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favours of Almighty God”

That was the year the government under the Articles of Confederation was formally dissolved and a new government created by the Constitution. A “bold and doubtful experiment” in Thomas Jefferson’s description which turned out far better than many expected.

In 1863 Abraham Lincoln proclaimed the last Thursday in November as a day of thanksgiving for Union victories in the midst of that terrible war.

The official date of Thanksgiving was fixed at its present date when Franklin Roosevelt signed a joint resolution of congress on December 26, 1941, just 19 days after the attack on Pearl Harbor led to America’s entry into World War II.

The next three Thanksgivings were celebrated in wartime when almost every family was touched in some way by tragedy.

I do realize how irritating it is when suffering hard times to have someone tell you it’s not so bad, that other people have had it worse, but the fact is – it has been worse.

We are living in uncertain times with no clear end in sight. Some fear this is the beginning of the end of America as we know it. But we are not lesser men than our ancestors, we can and will get through this.

Posted in News commentary, Op-eds | Leave a comment

The election, hooooo boy!

First of all to my friends who remember when I said changing the voting procedure scant months before the election was going to be nothing but trouble.

Told ya.

So there I was on election night at the local radio station with my Democrat colleague. I’d gotten the offer to be there only that morning and was not shall we say, their first choice.

Apparently they couldn’t get a typical Republican and someone said, “Hey Steve’s a libertarian conservative, close enough.”

So there we were, me totally out of my depth when talking about statewide elections but managing to come up with an interesting question or two when it came to general trends.

My Democrat colleague was perhaps a bit taken aback when it became evident Colin Peterson (D-MN) was not returning to Congress.

“He was the very last working farmer in congress,” I said. “Now ag policy will be set entirely by people who don’t know what the (bleep) they’re talking about.”

So 11 p.m. rolls around, we do the math and my Democrat colleague looking disappointed but dignified, graciously conceded Trump had it in the bag.

I dropped by the pub on the way home, guy behind the bar looks at his phone and yup, it’s Trump with a lead not likely to be overcome.

I go to bed like Thomas Dewey in 1948, thinking we have a president. Get up in the morning at 5 a.m. and find we don’t, or at least not the one we thought we had.

Seems an early morning vote dump flipped Michigan and Wisconsin. Surprise!

A friend with masochistic tendencies was watching all night and said both states had stopped counting for unexplained reasons then started again. And apparent there were glitches in software used in a number of key places.

So now it stands with Biden declared – by the news media remember that, as the presumptive winner. All heck is breaking loose in ways that will likely change a lot by the time this goes to press.

There are dark mutters on the right about war. On the left there are open calls for making lists of Trump supporters to punish them in unstated by ominous ways.

Everybody take a chill pill! I have some observations both sides should consider.

There will be legal challenges in several states: Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Nevada for sure.

If any of them go to the Supreme Court conservatives should remember three justices were appointed by Trump and one (Clarence Thomas) despises Biden for some pretty unforgiveable insults during his confirmation.

That may not be good. It could be argued they should recuse themselves. But if not, they might actually rule according to the law. You know, like judges are supposed to.

That could be good or bad depending on your position, and the facts of the case. If the facts do indicate invalid results nobody on the left will believe them.

On the other hand if Biden is sworn in he will likely preside over an administration as crippled as Nixon’s after Watergate.

He could be impeached for shady dealing with China and Ukraine. And… say it softly but once in office it will be impossible to hide Biden’s mental decline. He will be older on his first day of office than Reagan was on his last. It was certainly evident he could not match Trump’s energy during the campaign.

So conservatives, it’s not that bad. Leftists, it’s not that good.

Posted in Op-eds, Politics | Leave a comment

Little Red Rioting Hood

“Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm; but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.”
– T.S. Eliot

The New York Post recently featured the most charming photo of a cute little redheaded girl holding a baby goat and smiling at the camera so sweetly.

Her name is Clara Kraebber, 20, and she’s been arrested for participated in a vandalism spree that caused about $100,000 worth of damage. She faces a possible sentence of four years in prison for first-degree riot.

“Every city, every town, burn the precinct to the ground!” they reportedly chanted as they broke windows all along Lafayette St.

Ms Kraebber it turns out, is the daughter of a child psychiatrist father who teaches at Columbia University, and an architect mother. The family lives in a $1.8 million apartment and own a house in Connecticut with four fireplaces built in 1730.

If you’re struggling financially, I imagine this would make you furious. If you’re doing pretty well, you might be worried about your own children getting involved with that kind of stuff.

You might admire her commitment but deplore her methods.

You might feel a mixture of disgust and contempt seasoned with a dash of unholy glee at the thought of what she may experience in prison.

But whatever you feel, you’re probably asking yourself, “For God’s sake why?”

As in why are the children of affluence and privilege out on the streets of our major cities reveling in destruction?

And make no mistake, these are not the poor and dispossessed. A typical Antifa/BLM rioter is a white schoolteacher. There might be a sprinkling of poor minority youth among them, but they seem to be opportunists using the riots as a chance to grab some free stuff.

And, they’re not stealing food they’re stealing luxury goods.

What the heck is going on?

I’d like to draw your attention to something a psychologist named Abraham Maslow (1908 – 1970) thought up, the Hierarchy of Needs theory or “Maslow’s pyramid.”

I understand it has problems as a formal theory, but at base it’s so simple and obvious you’ve got to wonder why it took so long for anyone to think of it.

Human needs, are prioritized in order of importance. At the base of the pyramid are immediate survival needs: air, food, water, shelter. As these are satisfied more needs arise from the need for long-term survival: safety, family, belonging to a community. Above this, the need for self-esteem, satisfaction arising from meaningful work, etc.

And once all these are fulfilled, the need for what Maslow called “self-actualization” arises, the need to fulfill one’s human potential.

Maslow saw this as the key to developing psychologically healthy individuals. But I suspect he may have missed something. The possibility of it all going wrong at this point.

When people’s basic needs are satisfied maybe they’ll want to cultivate their intellect and any latent talents they have. And then again maybe they’ll just want to feel important.

And they can’t seem to find that satisfaction in mundane and boring ways such as say tutoring children with learning disabilities, it has to be of dramatic world-shaking importance.

Paradoxically, finding ways of satisfying the need of affluent and educated youth for meaningful action could be the most important problem our society faces.

Posted in Op-eds, Politics, Social Science & History | 1 Comment

Why I don’t like voting by mail

There are proposals that we do our voting by mail in the upcoming election due to the COVID crisis. I believe this is a very bad idea and here’s why.

To begin with, we don’t trust each other. And by “don’t trust each other” I mean the right believes the left is attempting to impose tyranny on our country and the left believes the right wants to declare martial law and murder them, or failing that spread COVID around to do the job.

The lunatic fringe of both sides has always had beliefs of this sort, but they are becoming increasingly mainstream.

Each side believes the other cheats in elections. The left believes the right commits “voter suppression.” The right believes the left engages in fraudulent voting by dead people, illegal residents, etc.

I have my own opinions about which is more likely. Consider the logistics of suppressing large numbers of voters versus simple ballot box stuffing for example.

But it doesn’t matter! What’s important is the confidence the public has in the electoral process. The concerns of both sides must be addressed, whether they are found to be valid or not. We have to find out one way or the other.

Hint to my friends on the left, it does not inspire confidence when you state, “Your concerns are a fantasy so we don’t have to address them.”

So now is not the time to be messing around with the electoral process when we’re sitting on a powder keg.

A friend in the UK says they’ve done it there for years.

My question to him was, so did they put the system in place hurriedly in a few months?

And can anyone cite a government program of this magnitude that worked perfectly right away? Because in the case of national elections, “works well enough” isn’t good enough.

Another friend brought up the issues of privacy and veracity. We have a secret ballot for a reason, so your voting choice can never be known for sure and used against you.

But he pointed out, an anonymous system such as we have presents its own problems with potential fraud.

Mail in ballots have several points of failure. Chief among these being a sudden surge on the postal system. What about massive delays in delivery, of as much as weeks? What if delayed ballots affect the outcome? How long would it be before we knew the outcome of the election?

Cast your memory back to the recent mail out of stimulus checks.

And note, this does not require bad faith on anyone’s part. It is likely to happen merely because of the complexity of the system.

The way it was explained to me was in terms of what engineers call “coupling,” in which one component of a complex system implicitly depends on another. A consequence of this is failure at any one point in the system can cause catastrophic cascading failure.

Examples include Apollo 13 and the Great Blackouts of 1965 and 2003.

Coupling the post office and the voting systems of all 50 states could create the perfect storm of 2020.

Can all of these problems be solved in a way that reassure both sides of the integrity of the vote, and are not implemented by shoving it down the throats of people suspicious of the motives and intentions of the other side?

Perhaps eventually yes. But do you think it can be done in the three months we have until the election?

Posted in Op-eds, Politics | Leave a comment

Riot season

I’ve got the feeling I should say something pithy and profound about the riots gripping our major cities. I’d really like to wait until I hear back from friends I trust who are actually going to have a look, but I’m afraid if I wait too long something awful is going to happen and I won’t be able to say, “Told ya.”

I’ve seen a few large-scale demonstrations. I was present at the largest demonstration of the 60s era, July 4, 1970, at the Washington Monument when Bob Hope had organized a Support America Day and Abbie Hoffmann called for a counter-demonstration.

In the late 90s I marched with the people of Sofia, Bulgaria down the yellow brick road in the demonstrations that brought down the last coalition government. We marched past the presidential residence where President Peter Stoyanov stood on the balcony and cheered us on waving the double V for victory hand sign.

And for months I marched with the people of Belgrade, Yugoslavia in the demonstrations against the second-to-last communist tyranny in Europe, past thousands of heavily armed troops. Every, single, day.

But with an estimated 17% of the city population on the streets every night I saw ZERO vandalism, beyond slogans on walls. And none of that was of the “Eff the pigs!” kind. Perhaps it was the virtue of the people and perhaps it was the presence of armed men we knew were waiting on orders to fire on the crowd.

So I’ve logged more demonstration time that most in this country. Until now at least. This has been going on for a while now and doesn’t look like it’s winding down.

Some observations, opinions, and questions.

In Portland residents report the disturbances are confined to a very small area around the federal building. A small (low hundreds) group of very violent people are responsible for the vandalism.

Opinions seem divided among people who are frantic with worry that a hastily-assembled largely-ineffective federal force means martial law and looming fascism, and those who are a tad perturbed the mob tried to barricade a lot of people in the federal building and set it on fire.

In Seattle rioters set fire to a Starbucks because it’s racist or something. A Starbucks located on the ground floor of an apartment building.

In Chicago 18 cops got sent to the hospital. Antifa types were caught on drone footage breaking away from the peaceful demonstrators, changing into Black Block clothing and passing out improvised weapons while concealing themselves with umbrellas.

Improvised weapons included frozen water bottles and PVC spears concealed as banner poles. You make a spear from PVC pipe by cutting it at a sharp angle so it looks like a hypodermic needle.

Ancient peoples do it with bamboo. It makes a big wound that’s hard to close.

Three cops in Portland may have permanent eye damage from lasers.

Commercial grade fireworks have been used in several places. The kind which require a license from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) to purchase, possess, and use. So, federal offense. And where are they getting them?

There’s been shooting. Negligent discharges and someone who got stupid and approached someone with a rifle and found out he wasn’t the only one armed.

OK we’ve seen worse but not for a while. Throughout the ‘60s and ‘70s there were about 1,700 bombs set by groups like the Weather Underground.

But it is very likely something awful is going to happen soon. Maybe from arson, maybe a Kent State type event.
What then?

Posted in News commentary, Op-eds | Leave a comment

When sending you child to college

When sending your child to college you have two things to worry about. One is that they will say the wrong thing and fall prey to the new Red Guards. Another is that they will join the new Red Guards.

The Red Guards were a movement in China encouraged by and fanatically loyal to Chairman Mao. Their self-proclaimed goal was to “make the whole universe red” by destroying the Four Olds: old customs, old culture, old habits and old ideas.

To that end they destroyed old monuments such as the shrine at the birthplace of Confucius, attacked fellow-students students from the “wrong” class, and delighted in physically humiliating professors.

A Chinese friend I helped defect after Tien an Min Square told me his father, a distinguished professor, was made to wear a dunce cap while being carried about in a chair and jeered by a mob of students.

Do I sound bitter? Paranoid? Like I’m engaging in exaggerated hyperbole for dramatic effect?

I assure you I am not. What I am is quietly furious.

We have all seen news items from college campuses that eerily echo those events of 1966-67 in faraway China. But this time one struck close to home.

A professor of journalism known to me was made to publicly apologize for a remark made in a class required for graduation.

I’m not going to identify him or the school, not yet. For one, I don’t have his permission. In fact I haven’t spoken to him in years

For another, I don’t have the juice. Let’s face it, I’m not a high-powered member of the commentariat. I’m a guy who writes for people like me living in rural America trying to make ends meet and raise their kids in a crazy world.

I’m not in a position to bring an army of indignant citizens to his aid, and I don’t want to make things worse.

From what I can gather, in an exchange with a student the professor said saying “OK Boomer” was something like calling someone by that slur we must call the N-word.
I confess it doesn’t strike me that way. Possibly because I only recently became aware of the “OK Boomer” thing. And perhaps because I find it difficult to take those that use it seriously.
However in this case a few students, all of them white according to the news, lodged a complaint. No doubt they were traumatized and felt unsafe by having been exposed to that terrible word.
I would suggest that if they’re traumatized by hearing a word with the nasty connotations of that one, then they’re going to have a heck of a tough time as journalists covering the police and fire beats. But I digress.

The prof, a brilliant and gifted teacher, has been made to apologize in public and will take the new right-think course, which they are talking about making mandatory for all.
A sub (also known to me, good man) will come in and teach the class for the rest of the semester.

He’d better watch his step now the students have gotten a taste of power.

And I can’t get the news photo I’ve seen out of my head. The look on his face…

I taught in Yugoslavia during the last years of the Milosevic regime. I’ve lectured in Belarus, “the last communist state in Europe,” and I said what I damned well pleased.
And I’m telling you, the only places I ever felt I really had to watch my mouth were Saudi Arabia – and American universities.

Posted in Academic, Free Speech, Op-eds | Leave a comment

Why impeachment won’t fly

Constitution of the United States
Article I: Section 3
6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
7: Judgment in Cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Article II: Section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Well, the House of Representatives voted articles of impeachment for President Trump, making him the third president in history to be impeached. And I have a sneaking suspicion he couldn’t be happier.

Because it isn’t going to fly. Not in the Senate and not in the court of public opinion. It’s going to backfire, big time.

Furthermore I think Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi thinks so too, since she’s been threatening not to send the articles over to the Senate as required by law unless they do things her way. It was a bluff all along.

Let’s first clear up something first. An impeachment is not removal from office, it’s an indictment. The House brings charges, the Senate tries the president and decides whether to remove him.

Which requires a two-thirds majority.

The Senate currently has 45 Democrats, 53 Republicans, and 2 Independents. Do the math, they’d have to flip 14 to 16 Republicans to remove Trump. Even Republicans who loathe him, and there are many, would think twice about giving the Democrats what amounts to a veto over any presidential election.

But in that other court where the media tries suspects? The legal issues are complex, and here opinions don’t break down along party lines.
Libertarian-conservative Judge Andrew Napolitano thinks there are clear grounds for impeachment.

Old-line liberal law professor Allan Dershowitz says no, and that this is an attempted coup.

So what are we who aren’t lawyers to make of it?

Most folks have a vague understanding that Trump is charged with pressuring Ukraine to dig up damaging information on potential rival Joe Biden. The information has to do with Biden’s son Hunter being hired by a Ukrainian energy company at a salary of 50 thousand dollars a month.

A month! For a guy whose knowledge and experience in the energy field is as close to zero as doesn’t matter.

And this is not a charge, these are facts that are not in dispute.

The argument for conviction is that pressure was applied by Trump on Ukraine and that this violates the law.

The defense is that there was no pressure, Trump just asked and Ukraine said, “Sure Donald, anything for a friend who’s going to give us arms as Russia prepares to re-conquer us.”
N
ow it could be there was a violation of the law, I don’t know.

And there’s the rub. Any violation is about a point of law most people find obscure and confusing. But there is nothing obscure or confusing about the Bidens’ corruption. That is clear, obvious, and indisputable.

And in the end, that’s what people will remember.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Privilege or advantage?

I participated in an interesting discussion a while ago that reminded me of the vital importance of using words correctly.

The discussion was about privilege. As in “white privilege,” “male privilege,” etc.

One person argued that the fact of being born middle class and not obviously a minority made you “privileged.”

Another responded that living with a felony record hardly made one feel privileged.

Another pointed out that a self-inflicted disability was not the same as being born to a class of people historically discriminated against.

Yet another pointed out that discrimination based on race, and more recently sex, is now not only socially unacceptable, it’s illegal.

Someone offered the counter-argument that discrimination can be very subtle and unconscious. And that those unconscious prejudices are most often held by those who grew up with parents who bought them books, sent them to good schools, introduced them to contacts who could help them, etc.

In short, the discussion reflected the larger discussion our society is having these days, seemingly without resolution.

It went on for a while, when something occurred to me.

First of all, I loathe the term (blank)-privilege. I think it’s an intellectually dishonest way to dismiss arguments out of hand rather than answer them. Because you’re privileged you know.

Furthermore it’s often self-serving and hypocritical. I’ve heard it used by people I know for a fact grew up in affluent families with every advantage.

And that’s when it hit me. When people say “privileged” what they often mean is, “advantaged.”

According to Merriam-Webster a privilege is: “a right or benefit that is given to some people and not to others,” and comes from the Latin privilegium, “a law affecting a specific person, or a special right.”

For sure it also means, “the advantage that wealthy and powerful people have over other people in a society.” Which is almost the same as one definition of advantage: “superiority of position or condition.”

But another definition of advantage is, “a factor or circumstance of benefit to its possessor.”

Now some are probably thinking I’m nit-picking (“engaging in fussy or pedantic fault-finding”) but I think there’s an important point here.

Privilege is a benefit conferred by law. Advantage is a benefit conferred by circumstances.

Privilege is unjust, advantage is just life. And life isn’t fair.

Growing up I had the advantage of parents who made sure I knew how to read and indulged me when I wanted to buy books. And while I might say I feel privileged for it, there was no law making them do so.

I’m well aware lots of kids didn’t grow up with that – and some of them were more affluent than we were.

My parents never tire of telling the story of when we visited a relative of my father, who being in private practice liked to point out my dad’s Navy salary might cover his greens fees.

While he was rubbing Dad’s nose in this I whispered to my mom, “Mother, are they very poor?”

“Why do you ask?” she said.

“They don’t have any books.”

I grew up with many such advantages. Almost all disadvantages are because of my own poor choices.

I’m well aware others didn’t have those advantages. But here’s why I don’t like to hear them called privileges. Because that implies it’s not just circumstances others didn’t – it means it’s my fault.

A collection of Steve Browne’s essays and newspaper columns, “The View from Flyover Country: A Rural Columnist Looks at Life in the 21st Century” is available on Amazon Kindle.

Posted in Culture, Op-eds | Leave a comment

Review/Commentary: Joker

“There’s always a joker in the pack, there’s always a cardboard clown. The poor painted fool falls on his back, and everyone laughs when he’s down!”
– Leslie Bricusse and Anthony Newley, The Roar of the Greasepaint – The Smell of the Crowd (1964)

My 13-year-old daughter wanted me to buy tickets for “Joker” for her and a friend so they could see it, but the friend cancelled – and I’m glad. Because I went to see it instead.

I’d been hearing about it, and I’d heard a lot of political commentary read into it. That’s par for the course for a lot of movies these days. But there was something odd about it.

There are conservative voices who loathe it, and conservatives who rave about it. Leftist reviewers generally tend to dismiss it as meaningless.

One leftist friend warned that if you see it you might be contributing to the music royalties of one Gary Glitter, currently serving time for sexual assaults on minors. (That is yet to be determined. It occurs to me it might contribute to restitution funds but again, no idea.)

But Arthur Fleck the Joker himself denies he’s trying to start a movement. He does anyway.

I must admit I sat through it in an almost empty theater, enthralled and disturbed.

A lot of other people must feel something similar because it’s making money hand over fist, equaling or surpassing Avengers: Endgame box office. That’s not meaningless, though what it might mean I’m still not sure.

Fears it would provoke violence caused New York City to stage a conspicuous police presence at screenings, but so far no disturbances have been reported.

However it has been reported that protestors in Beirut and Hong Kong have adopted Joker face painting as a symbol of heaven knows what.

Joker takes place in Gotham City of the DC comics universe, but in roughly the Nolan family Dark Knight version. There are no fantasy superheroes. Bruce Wayne is still a little rich kid on the cusp of the events that will cause him to recreate himself as The Batman.

This is the origin story of his arch nemesis the Clown Prince of Crime. It’s in the descent into madness genre with horror story elements.

Except Arthur Fleck’s descent into madness pulls a city teetering on the edge of madness with him into the pit. And the schlock horror convention is violated when it hints at but does not show the death of innocents.

There are two notable lines, one written one spoken, that cause me to pull a meaning out of what some describe as a meaningless movie.

One is a notebook entry that appears near the beginning of the movie, “The worst thing about having a mental illness is everyone expects you to behave as if you DON’T.”

I’ve heard that before, because it’s true. Our society is not kind to the mentally ill. After early 20th century reforms in housing the mentally ill we seem to have gone backwards, turning them loose on the streets to become homeless and chemically addicted.

The movie then comes back to this near the end with a riddle, “What do you get when you cross a mentally ill loner with a society that abandons him and treats him like trash?”

The answer comes with a bullet, “Exactly what you fucking deserve.”

So here’s what I think. The Dark Knight trilogy was based around the idea that Gotham, our civilization, was worth saving in spite of everything.

Joker is the case for the prosecution.

Posted in Culture, Movies, Op-eds | 1 Comment